Archive/ Testing/ Test Goblin v0.9
AI tools Claude supported MIT
Testing · CI · № 119

Test Goblin v0.9

Test Goblin is an AI workflow skill that scans for untested branches and writes edge-case tests for Vitest, Pytest, and JUnit projects.

0.9 by @rummage Released May 2, 2026 MIT 3 min
Example prompt

Example prompt coming soon

Install

Start with the ZIP package, then choose the AI tool workflow that fits your setup.

  1. Download test-goblin.zip (1.5 KB).
  2. Open the package and read SKILL.md, plus any included references, templates, or scripts.
  3. Use the instructions directly in any AI tool that supports reusable instructions, project knowledge, custom agents, or uploaded reference files.

For Claude Code, unzip into ~/.claude/skills/ so the folder lands at ~/.claude/skills/test-goblin/, then reload Claude Code. For Claude.ai, upload the same ZIP from Customize → Skills.

Use with other AI tools

This package is not locked to one vendor. If your AI tool does not support Claude-style skills, copy the core instructions from SKILL.md into the tool's custom instructions, project prompt, agent setup, or reusable prompt library.

  • Upload or paste any included reference files as project knowledge where your tool supports it.
  • Keep the output format from SKILL.md intact so results stay predictable.
  • Run a small test with your own data before using the workflow in production.

Compatibility depends on the features your AI tool provides. Treat scripts as optional local helpers unless your environment can run them safely.

Claude installation reference

The ZIP also follows Claude's Agent Skills structure: a folder with a required SKILL.md file plus optional scripts, references, templates, and resources.

Verdict /5

Changelog

  • v0.9 May 2, 2026 Initial release.

Skills that pair well, or that you'd reach for instead:

Review this skill

What did you think of Test Goblin v0.9?

Star ratings and written reviews show up in the public review feed after a light moderation pass. No login required.

Found a bug, broken example, or out-of-date instruction? We're listening.
Report a bug